The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of voluntary people in various kinds of organizations from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, it is clear that while the participants in environmental, sport, health care, educational organizations increased, the opposite was true for art and other voluntary companies. It is interesting to note that health care was the least popular type of voluntary job during the two years.
Looking at the changes in more detail, in 2008, volunteering in educational organizations was the most preferable choice, with 21% of spontaneous people applying for this job. Following this was environmental and art projects which had 21% and 18% volunteers took part in respectively. Lastly, there were 15% unpaid workers in other companies and only 7% helpers working in health care organizations, which made this the least prefered choice.
6 years later, in 2008, the order had been slightly changed. Although the conservational company was still the most trending choice in the volunteer community which rose to 29% of participants, unpaid sport job was the second favourite choice with 25% of volunteers applying for. Moreover, the contribution to educational, art and other companies had slightly decreased to 17%, 12%, 9% respectively. There was also a minimal rise in the volunteer worker in health care job, which was still the least favourite option.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what do you extent agree or disagree 61
- Many people are now spending more and more time traveling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, look, moreover, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40740740741 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11555843944 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1112230617 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148984186837 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668793039502 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753838066439 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11649626686 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867066728586 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, lastly, look, moreover, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40740740741 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11555843944 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578703703704 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1112230617 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148984186837 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668793039502 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753838066439 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11649626686 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867066728586 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.