The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
The table below depicts the comparison between four crucial economic and social indexes of four countries, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that Japan and Canada are far weightier than Peru and Zaire in terms of their citizens' economic and social living standards. By contrast, Peru and Zaire were two under-covered nations with practically poor life expectancy, as well as inadequate personal salaries, food supplies, and proficiency levels in reading and writing.
Initially, in 1996, the annual profits of Japan were the highest, at $USD 15,760. The second-greatest yearly average salary was Canadian, at $USD 11,000, while the annual income for a citizen in Peru and Zaire was lower than $200, which was nearly 100 times less than that of the two previous nations. Additionally, life expectancy at birth in Japan and Canada was 78 and 76 years, which is significantly higher than that of Peru and Zaire, with only 51 and 47 years, respectively.
Furthermore, the number of calories consumed by Canadians was the highest, at 3326 per person. This was followed by Japan, with 480 calories curtailed, and the figures for calories in Peru and Zaire ranked last, at 1927 and 1749 per person, twice as low as the ones in Canada and Japan. Finally, the proportion of adult literacy in Canada was approximately 100%, the same as the corresponding number for Japan. On the contrary, Peru and Zaire had far lower adult literacy rates, which were only 68% and 34%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al profits of Japan were the highest, at 15,760. The second-greatest yearly avera...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t yearly average salary was Canadian, at 11,000, while the annual income for a ci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, well, while, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03212851406 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70648169114 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562248995984 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9495375385 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.3 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973598096815 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452561164614 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778134314666 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941020482706 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103461298851 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.