Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others think that the main benefits are in the world business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, it can be undeniable that global collaboration has been rising and plays a crucial priority in many parts of the world, especially in making a contribution to globalization. While it is mentioned by some that the primary benefit of this phenomenon is to assure the environment of various tragedies, such as global warming or surges in sea levels, others argue that the major profit is enhanced worldwide business. This essay will discuss both aspects of this debate and outline my opinion on both.
On the one hand, coordination among numerous nations could have advantageous impacts on the conservation of the environment for some reasons. First, since different ecological issues, particularly global warming, are spreading over the planet alarmingly, government protective measures are just minimal stuff compared to the dramatic change of nature. Thus, global cooperation is able to address this dire problem on a large scale and more effectively. In other words, when countries conspire together, they may impose strict contemporary laws and regulations, as well as new ideas and a plethora of equipment to tackle environmental pollution significantly. To illustrate, in November 2015, during the 21st annual session of the Conference of the Parties to the Climate Change Convention held in Paris, over 190 governments in the world signed the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep the increase in average global temperature below 2 °C, limit this increase to no more than 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, eliminate greenhouse emissions, and move towards cleaner energy to ameliorate the environment. Furthermore, global solidarity could empower scientists to launch research seminars by exchanging their innovative concepts in order to conceive more natural resources like wind and solar energy associated with creating many artificial products like meat made by 3D-model programs and, hence, address environmental issues effectually.
On the other hand, while the redeeming features of collaboration around the world in the environment are widely acknowledged, I consider that international integration plays an indispensable role in business development. Firstly, if the worldwide market is open wide to conglomerates, they may be capable of exploiting adequate resources and achieving the goal of maximizing business profits. Besides, with the diversification of products and goods, consumers might have more decisions to buy their preferred stuff, which in turn means more employment opportunities being created. Additionally, the import and export rates in various countries may increase radically, and individuals can have a better quality of life.
In summary, I conclude that both environmental protection and business development are extremely significant in the process of propelling global progress. However, in the intricate context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is high time that global corporations paid more attention to recovering the worldwide supply chain and developing all the fields, especially in the economy, to reclaim a peak like the time before the pandemic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2650.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66239316239 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1839098227 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 176.041082164 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617521367521 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 506.74238477 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.8075473196 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.666666667 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127887892504 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430228322745 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477878801937 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778898570493 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443758698804 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.0946893788 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 78.4519038076 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.