the table described the changed of people who went for international travel in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
The table demonstrated the changes in the number of people traveled abroad between 1990 to 2005.
In the first year, it can be seen from the diagram that the European were the most enjoy traveling people among other cohorts, came top with 280.2 million one which far more than other areas. Meanwhile, Americans and people from Asia and the Pacific region took up the far second and the third place respectively. Besides, the African followed by 18.2 million people which were a double for the one in middle east areas.
As we can easily notice that the number of Europe constantly increased and always more than the number of other areas, ended up with 400 million. The figure for the rest areas except America both showed the same trend with Europe’s, while American figure went through a slight diminish in the last five years though it increased in the first decade. Therefore, the rank of America had fallen to the third place and was exceeded by Asia and the Pacific.
In brief, the total number of people who traveled globally significantly increased, from 448.9 million to 693.7 million.
- the diagram shows how an office building looks at the present and the plan for its future development 57
- the graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy for four countries from 1975 to 2000. 84
- Some people believe that only students with the best academic performance should be rewarded, while some other people think it is more important to reward students with improvement. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- the graph below shows concerns three productions in the forest industry in a European country The production is timber pulp and paper increasing during the years between 1980 to 2000 51
- Some people think computers and the Internet are more important in a child s education Others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children s learning Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, therefore, third, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8670212766 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36090531891 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4126803833 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192105854464 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929059272026 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115352509897 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158095039019 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132243420374 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.