The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The table illustrates the volume of rainfall by month of a year among five urban areas, namely Hongkong, Tokyo, Jakarta, Cairo, and London.

From a general perspective, while the average monthly rainfall of Hongkong, Cairo, and Tokyo reached a peak in the middle of the year, that of Jakarta and London got an annual high right from the start.

Regarding the oscillation of monthly rainfall, both Hongkong and Cairo hit a peak in August at 380 mm and 27 mm, correspondingly. It is interesting to note that Hongkong is experiencing the greatest, and Cairo has the smallest when it comes to the amount of rain. However, the following period is different as the average monthly rainfall in Hongkong gradually plunged to 151mm in October before dramatically declining to 35 mm in the last two months. Cairo, on the other hand, suffered from drought as their rainfall went into a nosedive to absolutely 0. As for Tokyo, in January, its average amount of rain is double that of Hongkong. Nevertheless, Tokyo's peak rainfall, which happened at 190 mm in June, is merely haft compared to Hongkong's counterpart.

Concerning Jarkata and London, at the beginning of the research year, Jakarta led the table with 300 mm of rainfall. This rainfall leveled out for one month before diving to 60 mm in August. It shot up again to 210 mm at the end of the year. The quantities of rain in London witnessed the same pattern as it troughed at 45mm in July before approximately restoring to its initial level of 79mm five months later.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-05 longpham2k 73 view
2022-06-28 hahahahahah 73 view
2022-02-19 Awadhesh Mourya 67 view
2020-09-11 Dwarakesh Suresh 73 view
2019-07-22 subashtimalsina112 72 view
Essays by user longpham2k :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rom drought as their rainfall went into a nosedive to absolutely 0. As for Tokyo, in Janua...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, as for, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81679389313 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77410293731 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7226104741 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156605737087 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657265449299 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347791743096 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111362250387 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289841547176 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.