The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The charts show the amount and quality of water supplied to two regions of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words.

The bar charts illustrate the population provided with water as well as the degree of the water's sanity in Australia and South East Asia between two different years of 1990 and 2010

From a general view, Australia's water supply volume and quality experienced an upward trend in the research years. Nevertheless, water supplied to South East Asia countries shot up in quantities but decreased in cleanliness.

Regarding the amount of available water in Australia, in 1990, 80% of people living in this region were supplied with water. This statistic surged as virtually every Australian resident had access to water two decades later. Together with the increase in volume, water purity in Australia is also improved by 10 percent, from approximately 70% in 1990 to above 80% in 2010.

As for the nations of South East Asia, over 60% of residents in this area had not been provided with domestic water in 1990. This rate plunged as in 2010, the amount of usable water rose to roughly 80%. However, the water immaculateness, already relatively deficient in 1990, deteriorated even further twenty years later. To be more detailed, the degree of sanitation of water in South East Asia was 40% in 1990 and fell back to about 5% in 2010

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-20 longpham2k 56 view
2022-03-14 lennie.butera 11 view
2021-06-12 Drake004 view
Essays by user longpham2k :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'waters'' or 'water's'?
Suggestion: waters'; water's
...with water as well as the degree of the waters sanity in Australia and South East Asia...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 208.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95673076923 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68084355239 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6190289156 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126466498204 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611543193748 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407372800231 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900481204808 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194733985737 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.