Missions to explore space are hugely expensive and there are problems on Earth which demand attention The number of these missions needs to be reduced Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn

Essay topics:

Missions to explore space are hugely expensive, and there are problems on Earth which demand attention. The number of these missions needs to be reduced.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 254 words.

There is a common belief that space-exploring operations are excessively lavish, especially in the context that there is a variety of different earthy issues that need to be taken into consideration. Hence, the advocates of this idea claim that it is imperative to cut down on the number of delving into the space. From my point of view, I found no justification to agree with this irrational statement since space expeditions may play an essential role in dealing with our planet's problems, namely environmental pollution and natural resource depletion.

First and foremost, commissions to discover the universe may open up a solution to the problem of environmental pollution. It is worth pointing out that the degradation of the Earth's ecosystem is a consequence of overpopulation. By the way of exemplifying, the soaring of the global population is synonymous with the increasing demand for comestibles. Such necessity can be met through more intensive farming with the overuse of agrochemicals or through deforestation to create new farmlands, which in turn can have negative ecological outcomes. Then, by exploring outer space, mankind may have an opportunity to discover a habitable place to immigrate. This will consequently solve the matter of overpopulation and indirectly solves the interrelated environmental issues.

In the second place, space exploration missions can also make a contribution to finding an answer to the shortage of natural resources. It does not seem unreasonable to suggest that the resources that are scarce on earth can be abundant on another planet. Then, the duty of space probing activities is to lay hands on such heavenly bodies, thereby creating a premise for space mining. For instance, celestial bodies in the solar system are potential sources for “rare earth” metals required for electronics, which consists of 17 elements, including lanthanum, neodymium, and yttrium, to mention but a few.

From these aforementioned explanations, one could draw the conclusion that the argument for reducing the number of missions to explore space is preposterous as inquiring closely into space is the indirect solution to environmental pollution as it solves the overpopulation. Moreover, such missions are against natural resource depletion through mining other planets and asteroids in the solar system

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-21 hieu13092006 78 view
2022-05-25 longpham2k 89 view
2021-01-09 eeshwar 78 view
2020-09-10 Dwarakesh Suresh 74 view
2019-06-10 subashtimalsina112 87 view
Essays by user longpham2k :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, for instance, by the way, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52077562327 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27165695459 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592797783934 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2151189878 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.866666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213657060091 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06308769897 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447802390003 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129524552557 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453227987097 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.