In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, there has been much debate around the issue that youngsters retain their lives under the same roof with parents even after finishing education and beginning working. While this trend may bring about some drawbacks, I would argue they are eclipsed by the benefits.
On one hand, staying with parents can assist adults in curbing the barrier between two generations. This action will facilitate face-to-face conversations as well as intimate interactions. A newly graduated student, for example, may ask their parents for advice, working experiences, etc so that they can confront troublesome bosses. Furthermore, living with family members arouses young people sense of affection which affects positively their working yield and vibes. For instance, it is so comfortable for the young to confide their professional affair to parents and get back supportive words after a long working day. Finally, this is an immense opportunity for sons or daughters to take care of their parents' lives owing to the face-to-face frequency.
On the other hand, this trend can do adults' lifestyles a great disservice. First and foremost, people whose parents are helicopter ones, are likely to prolong a period of immaturity which consequently renders them dependent on their parents in all aspects of life. Moreover, in terms of parents' perspective, they may want to have time and space for themselves, free of family responsibilities in the latter years. For example, a number of parents may wish their sons to settle down in the new houses, be self-sufficient so that they are able to live for themselves and contemplate the world for the rest of their lives
In conclusion, although it is advisable for youngsters to grasp this chance so as to be self-reliant and well-versed, I believe being under parents' wing will facilitate them to live happily, meaningfully and foster their parents in old age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student s accommodation 11
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- Some young people look forward to a year of traveling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ble for youngsters to grasp this chance so as to be self-reliance and well-versed, I bel...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22875816993 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9358266523 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.3520662017 49.4020404114 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.454545455 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2727272727 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217293290946 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845210943363 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419693958045 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140343974113 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040821711254 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.