Map of a City in 1950
The map illustrates the differences of a city from 1950 and today. As we can see, the population geographic of the city in 1950 was 20,000 which is escalated to 200,000 now.
Overall, the most important changes in the city were the expanded residential area, the business district and a new lake at the centre of the city. A new dam was built in the east region too.
Firstly, in 1950 almost the same space was occupied for the business district and residential area. Similarly, a small government building is situated near the bridge and right side of the main road. The main road was connected from south to north and east to west which is joining at the centre of the business district. Moreover, in the southwest region, there was an airport which is in between the river and main road.
However, today a noticeable modification is based on the river which is joining to a new lake and the old bridge comes over the lake to attach both the large business district and the vast residential area. Furthermore, near the dam, there is a new bridge which is joining from the main road comes from the west and attached to the old road in east. In addition, they extended the size of the airport and a new government building in the south of the city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | eyraen | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- It is believed that culture and tradition are lost when it is exposed for earning money. However, others believe it important part of promotion. Discuss and give your opinion. 78
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55066079295 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48938049983 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440528634361 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.97913196 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9090909091 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15489876854 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798571425258 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15145972965 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131335573537 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170057196168 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.