The table shows water use for different purposes in four countries.
The given table compares four different nations in terms of how water was used for distinct purposes such as agriculture, industry and domestic use.
It is evident from the table that Egypt and Canada were by far the countries using the highest amount of water in the table. Additionally, most of the water was utilized for cultivating crops in all countries, except for Canada and New Zealand.
Regarding agriculture, roughly 82% of the water was used for this purpose in Egypt, which outnumbered the share of New Zealand by approximately two to one, at 44%. Likewise, the rates of Saudi Arabica and Canada were dwarfed by that of Egypt, at 64% and 10% respectively.
In terms of industry, the figure for Canada accounted for 70% of the total, compared to 46% of the water used in New Zealand. At the same time, the percentages of Egypt and Saudi Arabica ranged from 30% to 10%. About domestic use, in Canada and New Zealand, local inhabitants utilized 20% and 10% of water for this purpose in turn, whereas the shares of other nations were below 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view |
- Some think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- many people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programmes Instead they get news about the world from the Internet Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting and they are best at Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The table shows water use for different purposes in four countries 73
- the plans below show how a ground floor of particular building has changed over time 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, whereas, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57934118433 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3941143314 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363916258467 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166439662903 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127583256986 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252897193146 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111724686139 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.