The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
The table data shows the leading mobile phone manufacturers’ global market share in 2005 and 2006. Generally speaking, Nokia had the highest global market share of cell phone both in 2005 & 2006 and the market shares of Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson increased in 2006 than their share in 2005.
As is presented, Nokia had the largest market share (one-third of total) in 2005 and their market share increased by 2.5% next year. Motorola had the second highest market share comprising over 17% in 2005 and their market share increase by roughly 4%. Samsung had been able to maintain the third position for their worldwide mobile phone market share, though their share decreased to 11.8% in 2005 compared to 12.7% in the previous year.
On the other hand, Sony Ericsson and L.G both had more than 6% market share in 2005. In 2006, though Sony Ericsson’s market share increased by 1%, L.G’s market share decreased. BenQ Mobile had the lowest market share in the cell phone market and their share dropped to half in 2006 than the previous year. All other mobile manufacturers’ market share comprised over 19% in 2005 and that reduced to slightly over 16% as Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson had been able to secure more market share worldwide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-18 | Jasmineeee | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | duchoangg24 | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | Minh Pham | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | SOBIROV.L | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Tracyabc | 78 | view |
- All over the world, societies are facing a growing problem with obesity. This problem affects both children and adults. What are the reasons for this rise in obesity? How could it be tackled?You should write at least 250 words.Give reasons for your answer 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 84
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food. Other people believe that education will not work. Discuss both 84
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased in 2006 than their share in 2005. As is presented, Nokia had the largest m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
... On the other hand, Sony Ericsson and L.G both had more than 6% market share in 2...
^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G&apos
...'s market share increased by 1%, L.G's market share decreased. BenQ Mobile h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98113207547 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56707501705 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429245283019 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4118548533 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533103503042 0.215688989381 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.299895275795 0.103423049105 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124567400204 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.424404830951 0.15604864568 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806871741279 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.