Task 1. The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012
The line graph demonstrates the proportion of exports from Australia to Japan compared to the United States, China and India over 22 years.
Overall, it is obvious that there was a distinct trend between the percentage of Australian oversea freights to Japan, the US and China, India. Furthermore, while China and India’s commodity market attracted more exports, Japan and the US experienced a downward trend during the survey. With regard to this, before 2005, highest percentage of exports to before being surpassed by that of China by the end of the period.
To begin with, in 1990, the figures for Japan stood at about 27.5 percent, which is about twice times as much as the US’ proportion, before diving to 20 percent in the next five years. What is more? By contrast, exports to China and India were low, at 2% and 1%, respectively, and exports to the USA fell to 9% in 1995, the figure for exports to China and India rose slowly.
On the other hand, since the proportion of exports to China overtook those of Japan and reached a peak of 30% in 2005, the export market had some fluctuations. It is remarkable that there was a sharp decrease in the percentage of Japan, which accounted for 14% in the last year of the period. Meanwhile, the figures for India also fluctuated, these rose overall to 6% in 2012.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Task 1 The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...survey. With regard to this, before 2005, highest percentage of exports to before being s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this rose' or 'these rises', 'these roses'?
Suggestion: this rose; these rises; these roses
... the figures for India also fluctuated, these rose overall to 6% in 2012.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, while, to begin with, what is more, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55382020156 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547413793103 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2762096619 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153623503207 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592677245414 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399717095193 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988529734051 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186296866567 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.