Test
he reading and the lecture are both about the accuracy and reliability of Chevalier memoir The author of the reading feels that Chevalier distorted many events in order to make his life seems more exciting. The lecturer challenges to claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that Chevalier memoirs were more accurate and reliable.
To begin with, the author argues that evidence recently suggested that Chevalier had borrowed money from swiss merchants. The article mentions that Chevalier claims to be wealthy while living in Switzerland. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that Chevalier had to sell his assets for the money. Additionally,he claims that Chevalier had to wait for the cash to arrive back.
Secondly, the writer suggests that memoirs cannot capture the accuracy of Chevalier and Voltaire conversation since it had written many years after the conversation occurred. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that Chevalier had taken written notes and journal each night he had conversations. He elaborates on this by bringing up to the point that Chavalier witnessed each of his writings before creating memoir.
Finally, the author posits that Chevalier jailers were bribed for his notorious prison escape in venice. Moreover, it is stated in the article that Chevalier had large number of political well connected friends. Ib contrast, the lecturer position is that despite there were more politically connected friends than Chevalier other prisoners were not able to bribe. The lecturer notes that government recently launched the news that sealing of Chevalier prison need to be repaired which additionally suggest that Chevalier had broken escaped the prison.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-15 | MaxHill1 | view | |
| 2024-03-04 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-18 | tsln7607 | 82 | view |
| 2023-11-01 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 23
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Test 16
- Test 11
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he reading and the lecture are both about ...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'reads'.
Suggestion: reads
he reading and the lecture are both about the accu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , he
...l his assets for the money. Additionally,he claims that Chevalier had to wait for t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 3.15609756098 539% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 5.60731707317 553% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41111111111 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71038241573 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548148148148 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9399616532 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.