The three pie charts below show how the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991, and 2001.
The pie charts indicate the variations in yearly expenditure by a certain school in the UK in three surveyed years.
Overall, salary paid for teachers accounted for the biggest proportion in this school’s annual budget while the least belonged to expenses on insurance. In addition, spending on the other categories experienced some interesting fluctuations.
Starting in 1981, the total yearly spending on insurance took up a modest amount, just 2%, after which it increased to 8% in 2001. Meanwhile, in 1981 the figure for teachers’ salaries made up 40%, before reaching to half of the total spending in 1991. However, it declined slightly to 45% in 2001.
Salaries paid for other workers gradually dropped through the three questioned years, starting at 28% in 1981 and hitting the low at 15% in 2001. Amazingly, despite getting the same amount of money spent in 1981, the figures for resources and furniture and equipment fluctuated contradictorily over the period. Clearly, in 1981 the total amount of money spent on buying resources was responsible for 15%, followed by an incredible rise to 20% in 1991, but falling down to 9% in 2001. By contrast, between 1981 and 1991, this school remarkably cut down on the budget for furniture and equipment from 15% to 5%, before climbing up again to 23% in 2001.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 61
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 84
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 61
- life cycle of a salmon from an egg to adult fish 61
- The three pie charts below show how the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0504587156 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79330680656 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.808596906 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247706943484 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975493642548 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053407260728 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15372699844 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537714625854 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0504587156 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79330680656 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.808596906 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247706943484 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975493642548 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053407260728 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15372699844 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537714625854 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.