The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The three pie charts describe the annual spending in a certain school in the UK, which is different from time overs time after a decade.
Overall, the payment for teacher salaries remained the highest cost, whereas the minimum spending was paid for insurance.
Regarding the charts, in 1981, the salaries for the teacher was two-fifth of the budget, then it rose slightly by 10% ten years later, eventually dropping to 45% in 2001, but still the largest.
The change between investment in insurance and other workers' salaries was contrasting. While the insurance expenditure increased stably during two decades from 2% to 3% and 8% in 1981, 1991, and 2001 respectively, the decline of workers' payment continuously, with 28% initially and 15% in 2001.
Moreover, spending on resources and furniture/equipment was equal at the beginning of the 80s decade, at 15%, but the change fluctuated. In 1991, resources expenditure increased to 20% before fell to 9% in 2001, in contrast to the decrease at first of furniture by 10% and rose nearly a quarter later.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08045977011 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9241297983 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.943182055 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 5.23603664747 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164659723244 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716782527747 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552707277961 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085897063317 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605463986718 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08045977011 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9241297983 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.943182055 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 5.23603664747 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164659723244 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716782527747 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552707277961 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085897063317 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605463986718 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.