The three pie charts describe a transition per decade about changes in annual spending by particular UK school. The data was measured in percentages.
A quick look at the charts is quiet enough to make it clear that that Insurance hardly ever growing up remarkable during Teachers Salaries were the biggest yearly expenditures happened at 1981 while Insurance in the first year as the smallest.
In 1981, Teacher Salaries had become the biggest value which has two fifth, Other Workers Salaries had more than a quarter, followed by Furniture and Equipment and Resource e.g Books which obtained Twice of less than a fifth, then Insurance had a very small number. In the next decade, the biggest number all over the charts was showed within Teachers Salaries had half, Other Workers Salaries was more of a fifth then Resource e.g Books has a fifth while Furniture and Equipment has one in twenty and the last was Insurance 3%.
Then first year in the beginning of twenty century Teachers Salaries only had more than two fifths, Furniture and Equipment increased to the number of less than a quarter, Other Workers Salaries analyzed had discrepancy year by year which in this year had less than a fifth, then Resource e.g Books has 9%, however we can found the digit of Insurance had increased by 5 digits from the last decade which was had more of one in twenty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-13 | Fuad Allatif | 11 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | Fuad Allatif | 11 | view |
- The graph gives information about changes in the birth and death in new Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy of France in two years 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76303317536 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35283117954 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464454976303 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 22.4926829268 231% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.2495954682 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 251.25 112.824112599 223% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.75 22.9334400587 230% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0396471916521 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312150815568 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299498300219 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290336857096 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00987115379776 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.4 13.2329268293 207% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 35.62 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 10.3012195122 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.22 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.8 10.9970731707 207% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.