The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main futures, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart given below illustrates the result of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. The data is measured in percentages.
Overall, the biggest percentages was people who went to cafe for coffee and tea in last 4 weeks in Melbourne while bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks in Brisbane was less preferable.
The survey implemented in three categories. Firstly, the average buying and drinking habits was dominated by went to a cafe for coffee or tea which has the biggest number, the city was in Melbourne by approximately two thirds, followed by Hobart by 63, respectively. Adelaide has just under half as lower than instant coffee by slightly margin 2% more or less. However, Hobart has the biggest percentage of instant coffee addict which has almost 55% representing higher number than other Cities.
Finally, Australian citizens in order to bought fresh coffee was below more than two fifths. It was popular in Sydney by approximately 43% and Melbourne which has more than two fifths. Brisbane was approximately 33% attained smallest number compared with Adelaide and Hobart.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists Travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 100
- The graph gives information about changes in the birth and death in new Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The three pie charts describe a transition per decade about changes in annual spending by particular UK school The data was measured in percentages 11
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main futures and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, third, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14438502674 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73792613604 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5014414227 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205174819496 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881817785779 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133803450528 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163485615164 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147098210249 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.