Topic: The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country, namely timber, pulp, and paper from 1980 to 2000.
The graph illustrates the manufacturing process of the primary forest industry goods in a specific European nation, including timber, pulp, and paper between 1980 and 2000.
In general, it is apparent that almost all three categories fluctuated wildly throughout the examination period. However, there was a positive recovery trend at the end of the timeframe in terms of timber and pulp production, whereas the converse was true for the production of paper.
Looking at the chart, the figure for manufacturing pulp was the most dominant and took the lead at approximately 6 million tons in 1980. This figure was also greater than the number of timber produced roughly by 1 million tons. Surprisingly, the number of pulp production underwent a dramatic plummet by roughly 4 million tons before rebounding drastically in 1985. Until 2000, this figure experienced a considerable increase after maintaining stable for 10 years. Regarding timber manufacture, despite standing at the second-largest production behind pulp in 1980, its figure was noteworthy experiencing an upward trend rapidly to reaching a peak at 10 million tons before declining significantly by merely 2 million tons. Since 1985, the figure continued slumming to reach at nearly 8 million tons in 2000.
Turning to paper production, in spite of making the smallest portion in 1980, accounting for 4 million tons, the number of its production witnessed a substantial growth for 20 years, over two-fold greater than its starting recorded figure in 1995. Thereafter, there was a downward trend slightly before rebounding sharply to take the lead at 12 million tons at the end of the period.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 84
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, whereas, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33079847909 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98458501143 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1515069748 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202584596587 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853191193881 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824385540219 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158290507284 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934961974103 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, regarding, second, so, whereas, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33079847909 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98458501143 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1515069748 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202584596587 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853191193881 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824385540219 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158290507284 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934961974103 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.