Topic: The use of social media (e.g. Facebook and Twitter) is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life.
In the realm of cutting-edge technology, people today pay much attention to utilizing virtual reality, and online platforms such as Facebook or Twitter as a substitute for interacting face-to-face daily. Yet there are many opinions on whether virtual reality is a positive or negative trend for the community. From my standpoint, I believe that this current trend will do many wonders for human life.
One major ground behind the reason why several people suppose to use social media platforms will do more harm than good for people’s lives is that this approach might decrease the effectiveness of daily communication. In fact, interacting through portable devices, in the long run, is likely to reduce the frequency of having intimate conversations. As a result, people are not capable of expressing their emotions as well as opinions effectively, leading to easily getting into trouble with miscommunication, even breaking a valuable relationship. In addition, if residents spurle too much time on indulging themselves in social mainstream, and neglecting other people surrounding them, they may have no interest in connecting with current life. In a long-term perspective, these people are likely to undergo isolated period, having an adverse effect on their mental health.
Nevertheless, the tendency towards utilizing social networks for communication is more advantageous overall. The first advantage is that social media allows people to get instant access to the wealth of information at their fingertips so that they can connect with neighbors around the world without much difficulty. This powerful function has completely done away with geographical barriers and maintained tight relationships no matter how the distance is. Furthermore, in the era of globalization, people have to be proactive to update the latest information to keep pace with the developments on the globe. Hence, thanks to breakthrough virtual communication, people can get access to various websites, forums, or social media platforms to raise their voices and deliver novel ideas to the community.
In conclusion, the growing reliance on social media for communication comes with certain drawbacks, such as a potential decrease in the depth of interpersonal connections and a risk of social isolation, I am convinced that the merits of this trend will facilitate human life by doing away with the distance barriers as well as stimulating social activism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | wittymickey | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | annenguyen0203 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | meemeemee | 82 | view |
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead going directly to university What are the advantages and disadvantages 67
- Line graph The percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources TV Radio Newspaper Internet 89
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52393617021 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15214107859 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593085106383 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4633796991 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.357142857 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264430814329 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806180686667 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627955750873 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158218927849 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613976576486 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.