Topic: Fewer young people choose to work in farming. What are the reasons? Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
With the prosperity of modern society, there are more and more different jobs in labor market with valuable profits. This fact leads to young people are not caught their attention to agricultural activities. This essay will shed light on more details about the reasons behind this trend as well as some practical solutions to tackle this issue.
One major ground that lies behind the rising of the decrease in farming work is that there is a myriad of occupies which are offered by numerous companies outside. Thanks to cutting-edge technology, there are often better career prospects available outside their hometown to people of working age. Bigger cities or countries are hubs of various industries, which promise more career opportunities, particularly significant sufficient income. Therefore, youngsters have a tendency to devote themselves wholeheartedly to work related to technology or the economic field with the aim of climbing to career ladder rapidly. In addition, the fact is many young people today hold a belief that doing farming is the association with poverty and harsh living conditions. This is because farmers often make a huge effort to take care of their crops for months. Yet, farmers cannot ensure having fruitful crops due to numerous factors such as bacteria, weather conditions, or diseases.
Actions should be taken as soon as possible in order to minimize detrimental impacts on balancing the economy as a whole in the long term. According to the current statistics, peasants are experiencing the old period in Vietnam. By that I mean, if the youth still do not engage in farming work, there are not probably any next generations joining hands to enhance the productivity of agricultural products. Another reason springs from the fact that nowadays, children have more chances to get access instantly to relevant information by smart devices at an early age. In terms of familiar with advanced technology, they may find various approaches to incorporate those technologies in modern farming. Accordingly, helping peasants solve many agricultural problems, such as remote-controlled helicopters, which assist to spray pesticides.
In conclusion, it is due to the narrow-minded perception of farming and the abundance of career choices, leading to discouraging the youth from partaking in this area. I believe that by figuring out their ability to integrate those state-of-art applications into farming is likely to accelerate them to doing farming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | nhungnhungnhungnhung | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic Even though globalization affects the world economies its downside must not be neglected Discuss 89
- Topic The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school and unable to find jobs after graduation What problems do you think youth unemployment will cause to the individual and society Give reasons and make some suggestions 89
- Some people think that some individuals are naturally good leaders while others think individuals can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41237113402 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98947741863 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8973815789 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215266509095 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568046555775 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643230241011 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1110681592 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427852046608 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.