The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred

Essay topics:

The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred.

The provided graphs compare the proportion of 5 different types of energy sources in the USA between two years, 1980 and 1990.

A glance at the graphs reveals that most of the sources of energy experienced slight changes, except for hydroelectric power. In both years 1980 and 1990, oil took the largest slice of the pie graphs.

In 1980, oil accounted for nearly half of the amount of energy sources, while in 1990, the percentage reduced to only 33%. The second highest use of energy source in 1980 was natural gas with 26%; however, in 1990, it became the third due to a fractional decrease by 1%.

A quite different picture can be seen in the coal section. The proportion of coal rised from 22% in 1980 to 27% in 1990 making it the second highest use of energy source. In 1980, nuclear power accounted for 5% in 1980, which was equal with the amount of hydroelectric power. While in 1990, the proportion of hydroelectric power remains the same, the percentage of nuclear power increased by 5%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-05 Blackcytrus view
2021-08-11 minhpn 67 view
2021-06-26 trantouyen 100 view
Essays by user minhpn :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70056497175 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52181265862 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.055970146 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4444444444 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272354376412 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117016048997 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761907206949 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191190852665 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585899483467 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.