The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
The two maps in Task 1 illustrate how road access to a hospital in the city has changed from 2007 to 2010. There was a variety of accessibilities to the hospital in 2010 in comparison to that of 2007.
In 2007, while the staff and the public use the same car park; in 2010, it was divided into 2 separate areas. In particular, the staff car park remained at the entrance, however, the public one was moved to the East side of the hospital.
In 2010, it appeared the existence of the roundabout to the East, replacing the former bus stop. The bus station was moved to the West-South entrance of the hospital, to the left of the Hospital Road. Moreover, there were also 2 more roundabouts that existed after 3 years of construction. The two ones were built on the 2 sides of Hospital Road. One was at the entrance to the city hospital and the other was at the junction of Hospital Road and City Road.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak in a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak in a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oved to the East side of the hospital. In 2010, it appeared the existence of the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.375 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56772633616 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505952380952 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.5112578359 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384546805492 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176541901181 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167666402995 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295571976037 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216719626625 0.0819641961636 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.