The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
The two maps in task 1 illustrate changes in the construction of transportation infrastructure to the city hospital in two separate years, 2007 and 2010. There are a variety of modifications, including parking places, bus stations, and roundabouts.
In terms of parking areas, in 2007, a car park was constructed for both staff and the public at the south entrance to the hospital. However, in 2010, staff and the public used 2 detached parking places. The public car park was located to the right of the city hospital, while the staff car park remain at the initial place.
When it comes to the bus stop, there were 6 in total with three on each side of the hospital road in 2007. 3 years later, one big bus station was constructed at the southwest entrance to the city hospital, replacing the old bus stops. Also in 2010, it appeared the existence of 2 roundabouts at the beginning and the end of Hospital Road. The first roundabout was placed at the junction of the hospital road and the ring road, leading to the city hospital. The other one was located at the four-way intersection of hospital road and city road, expanding the whole transportation system.
- Living in a country where you have to speak in a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak in a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74384236453 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82792946887 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8174242293 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283675724193 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126198217132 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108680687533 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202982020464 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104162675578 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.