The two pie chart below show some employment pattern in Great Britain in 1992.
The circle charts underneath, it is informed some details between the both gender in Great Britain. The details was displayed as percentage some sectors contained.
We can see that Clerial or Related sectors listed in the top place for female. Meanwhile the Managerial and Professional being preference for male, most of them was not choosed General Labourers as their favourites.
Regarding to the first pie chart, it indicating that Clerial or Related was the top first place which had percentage of 31%, followed by Managerial and Professional in the second list which had almost less than a third, and the next highest value was more than a quarter for Other Manual. In the other hand Other Non Manual, Craft or Similar and General Labourers had the total more of one in ten which were the minimum value.
Turning to the second chart, seemingly males chose into Managerial and Professional, it was filled a digit more than a third of whole percentage. Taken by Other Manual which had a digit more of a quarter, Craft or Similar comes as the third (24% employment rate), General Labourers, Clerial or Related, and Other Non Manual represented as most non preferential female choosen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | Sandeep USA | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Sakib | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | mocmoc2610 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view |
- The two pie chart below show some employment pattern in Great Britain in 1992 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists Travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 78
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 73
- The three pie charts describe a transition per decade about changes in annual spending by particular UK school The data was measured in percentages 11
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy of France in two years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...th gender in Great Britain. The details was displayed as percentage some sectors co...
^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ors listed in the top place for female. Meanwhile the Managerial and Professional being p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for male, most of them was not choosed General Labourers as their favourites. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65927445229 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3852882252 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917809245284 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498403534113 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695531999751 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684917915267 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075185111297 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.