The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists Travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.
The charts given below illustrates the number of Japanese tourist travelling abroad and Japan tourist market to Australia over the period of 1985 to 1995. The data is measured in numbers and percentages.
Overall, the most highest Millions of Japanese travelling abroad was in 95, while in 85 experienced as the less enthusiast. However, the percentage of Australia's share of Japanese market had fluctuate record.
The number of Japanese traveler in 85 was about approximately 5, while it increased gradually in 90 which had about 11 then dramatically decreased to 10.5 more or less. In 92 and 93 seems no big difference with just under 12 and 12 in 93. The second biggest number was in 94 which means it was lower by the year of 95 with 1.2 approximately difference.
Furthermore, the graph shows increase of Japanese tourist during 85 to 88 by just under 5 then it was decrease to about 4.2 in the next year. Although the trends describes increase in 93 as the highest percentage by more than 5, in the last yearly monitoring was decrease at 5 level of traveler.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...umbers and percentages. Overall, the most highest Millions of Japanese travelling abroad ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
...umbers and percentages. Overall, the most highest Millions of Japanese travelling abroad ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, then, thus, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80540540541 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86596613204 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5080863734 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357771404018 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152618193568 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187995139946 0.0843802449381 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253921994522 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202150396976 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.