The two pie charts show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant.

The given two piecharts illustrate the different modes of communication (Phone,Letter and Computer ) preferred in 2 different years 1962 and 1982 respectively .

It is noticeable from both the charts that as year advances , phone dominated all other means of communication whereas , Letter which was popular in the year 1962 almost vanished after 20 years.

It can be clearly seen that in 1962, half of the population (50%) depend on letters to convey messages to each other whereas, phone was on its slow progression in the field of communication and contributed only 35 % .Probing further , the least popular one on the same year was the Computer which constituted almost 15%.

While considering the year 1982, the dominance of letter which was common in 1962 dramatically reduced to one in ten (10 %) after 20 years. Surprisingly, it was phone which substituted the letter and contributed almost similar percentage as that of letter . Moving forward , the use of computers gradually doubled (30%) in 2 years .

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n two piecharts illustrate the different modes of communication Phone,Letter and...
^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te the different modes of communication Phone,Letter and Computer preferred in...
^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Letter
...different modes of communication Phone,Letter and Computer preferred in 2 different...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...modes of communication Phone,Letter and Computer preferred in 2 different years...
^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ommunication Phone,Letter and Computer preferred in 2 different years 1962 and ...
^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...fferent years 1962 and 1982 respectively . It is notice...
^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent years 1962 and 1982 respectively . It is noticeable from both the charts th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...om both the charts that as year advances , phone dominated all other means of comm...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...all other means of communication whereas , Letter which was popular in the year 19...
^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 years. It can be clearly seen that in 1962, half of the population 50% depe...
^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ereas, phone was on its slow progression in the field of communication and contri...
^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... communication and contributed only 35 % .Probing further , the least popular one ...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Probing
...ommunication and contributed only 35 % .Probing further , the least popular one on the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d contributed only 35 % .Probing further , the least popular one on the same year ...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year was the Computer which constituted almost 15%. While considering the ye...
^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n ten 10 % after 20 years. Surprisingly, it was phone which substituted the lette...
^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ost similar percentage as that of letter . Moving forward , the use of computers g...
^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntage as that of letter . Moving forward , the use of computers gradually doubled ...
^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mputers gradually doubled 30% in 2 years .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1975308642 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0236349965 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.3228716418 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 1.69756097561 1119% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972728524787 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558102607601 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373275891892 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716769879188 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319332367863 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.