The two piecharts below show the percentage of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016
The piecharts compare information about the proportion of varioud manufacturing areas affording to the economy of turkey in 2000 and 2016.
In an overview, it can be noticed that, agriculture and helthcare were the most significant contributing sectors in the initial and final year respectively in comparison to other sectors.
As it is apparent from the figure that, agriculture, which contributed about 24 percent of its income to the economy of turkey in 2000 declined significantly to 14 percent in 2016. Similar trend of decrement can be seen for leisure and government areas,however, in lesser proportion.
On the other hand, the construction field allocated only 3 percent of its earning in the initial year increased by more than 3 fold and reached to 10 percent in the final year. Likewise, the proportion of manufacturing and finance also rose to 12 percent and 8 percent respectively whereas there was just increment of 2 percent in trade in the final year. As for healthcare the affording to the nation remained constant at 17 percent in both years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...be seen for leisure and government areas,however, in lesser proportion. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f 2 percent in trade in the final year. As for healthcare the affording to the nat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, whereas, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12174728677 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9163422691 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142027252804 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725915535436 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972906245366 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116592498004 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935626575245 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.