The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of industry’s factors of participation to the Turkey economy in the year 2000 and 2016.
Generally speaking, in 2000, agriculture contributed the most to the economy and construction did the least. In contrast, healthcare and education had the highest contribution and the lowest were finance, business and other at the end of the period
In 2000, the percentage of agriculture contribution took up nearly a quarter and reached its highest point. The opposite would be true for construction which accounted for 3%. The figure of agriculture was six times as much as the number for construction. Similarly, manufacturing and finance, business and others had a minor percentage, which were between 5% and 8%.
In the following period, 17% of healthcare contributed to Turkey's economy, followed by trade, utilities (16%). Finance, business had a minor (8%) contribution to the nation's economy. About a tenth of the government and construction’s proportion contributed to the economy of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | hoyishamia | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-21 | moon21 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | anxiety44 | 48 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | shubham0708 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...the highest contribution and the lowest were finance, business and other at the end ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ness had a minor 8% contribution to the nations economy. About a tenth of the governmen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43209876543 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32616971436 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.441444597 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170309717547 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728840430917 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811702905785 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127601484569 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869705497499 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.