Write a report for a university lecture describing the information in the graph.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The provided line graph reveals the information regarding the acid level in mouth by consuming sugars and honey.
Overall, it is clearly seen that ph level was lowest after five minutes of eating those sugary things: fruit sugar cane sugar and honey.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that ph level of mouth by consuming fruit sugar was highest while eating, was decreased by 3 levels in 4 minutes. After that it started to incline gradually and reached to level 7 in just 30 minutes. Whereas, ph level of sugar cane consumer's mouth, which as same as others in beginning, faced quick decline in 5 minutes and recorded lowest on ph level 3.5.
Apart from this, after crossing acid level at which tooth occurs on 30 minutes, ph level of cane sugar eater's mouth reached to highest point in next 10 minutes. However, ph level was founded 7 while eating honey, which saw a 2 level decline in first 5 minutes of eating, remained same for 5 minutes. Ph level of honey eater's mouth, reached to highest level again in just 25 minutes after crossing acid level at which tooth decay is unlikely in 12 minutes of time period after eating honey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-18 | vishalpreet | 56 | view |
- All over the world societies are facing a growing problem with obesity This problem affects both children and adults What are the reasons for this rise in obesity How could it be tackled 84
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 78
- Write a report for a university lecture describing the information in the graph Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 34
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Write a report for a university lecture describing the information in the graph Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...evel of cane sugar eaters mouth reached to highest point in next 10 minutes. However, ph l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...Ph level of honey eaters mouth, reached to highest level again in just 25 minutes after cr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, whereas, while, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60591133005 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22122154124 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492610837438 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6428210313 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0191471636962 0.215688989381 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0182374498435 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358103348168 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0279975455298 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437591697711 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...evel of cane sugar eaters mouth reached to highest point in next 10 minutes. However, ph l...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...Ph level of honey eaters mouth, reached to highest level again in just 25 minutes after cr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, whereas, while, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60591133005 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22122154124 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492610837438 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6428210313 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0191471636962 0.215688989381 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0182374498435 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358103348168 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0279975455298 0.15604864568 18% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437591697711 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.