You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.

Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The provided bar graph illustrates the worldwide sales of virtual games from 2000 to 2006, which could be played on four categories of devices including mobile phones, the internet, on console and with handheld gadets. The data on the sales was suppplied in billions of dollars.

Overall, the sale of console games had dropped since 2000 as opposed to handheld games which had increased throughout the years. Online games and mobile games were introduced in 2001 and 2002 respectively. Although the sale of internet games was lower than that of mobile games till 2005, the online games were reported to be sold more in 2006 when compared to mobile games.

Nearly 12 billions dollars were earned by the companies by selling handheld games in 2000 which gradually climbed up to be about 18 billions dollars in 2006. Even though the global sell of console games cost around 6 billions dollars in 2000, the sale of this type of games had gone down in 2006.

Despite being the newest to the gaming industry, the sale of cellphone games raised quickly to 6 billions dollars in 2005 which was closely followed by the sale of the online games. However, in 2006, the sale of online games was higher than 6 billions dollars and the same of mobile games which was still around the said amount.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-16 dorae 56 view
2023-03-24 Ahihi12 84 view
2023-02-16 Mai Phuong Fung 78 view
2022-09-23 jadenguyen 78 view
2022-08-24 kavi jk 84 view
Essays by user HUUH :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79372197309 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.283607796 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488789237668 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7446438471 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241207379194 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125965487269 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052866744589 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170926229571 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540123072968 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.