You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The chart describes the data about families weekly expenditure prospects in 1968 and in 2018.
The most significant spent rate is on food with a 35% ratio in the year 1968.Housing and clothing come nest with the same prospect of 10% of the weekly income Expenditure on leisure, transport. personal goods and household goods are almost same percentage, the former one is slightly more. Lastly, spent rates on fuel and the others are recorded the least with a 6% in the year of 1948.
Turning to 2018,food expenditure of families had dropped dramatically to a percentage between 15 to 20.On the other hand, housing spent had rised significantly with an almost 20% slightly more than food expenditures The most crucial rise was recorded on leisure spent rates It had soared about 10% in 50 years Transportation expenditures comes after and followed by Household goods and the othe categories respectively, Last three had remained the least just as in 1968 which is fuel and power, clothing and footwear and personal goods
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays more and more people from different cities are spending more time away from their families What are the possible reasons and the effects on the people themselves and their fami lies 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 67
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible arguments on both sides and say which side you personally support 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Housing
... food with a 35% ratio in the year 1968.Housing and clothing come nest with the same pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personal
...come Expenditure on leisure, transport. personal goods and household goods are almost sa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...ically to a percentage between 15 to 20.On the other hand, housing spent had rised...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02941176471 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8377155879 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 170.60785445 43.030603864 396% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13293099467 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895322535337 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780043185205 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131266554307 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756070394285 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.