You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. (Million).
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table presents data on the number of individuals traveling internationally from 1990 to 2005. Overall, there was a decrease in the number of people visiting America, while the remaining regions experienced an opposite trend. Europe had the highest number of international travelers throughout this period.
In 1990, Europe had the highest figure with 280.2 million tourists, followed by America with 80.5 million visitors. The number of American tourists was 20.3 million higher than that of Asia and the Pacific and approximately four times greater than Africa's. The Middle East had the lowest number of foreign visitors at only 9.8 million.
By 1995, Europe's number of international tourists steadily increased, reaching a peak of 390.3 million. Meanwhile, America saw a slight decline, ending the period at 113.2 million visitors. Africa experienced a significant increase during the first ten years, surpassing 28.7 million tourists by the end of the period. Similarly, the Middle East witnessed a marginal climb of 3.7 million tourists, which continued to rise to 15.8 million by 2005.
Strikingly, in 2000, the data for America and Asia and the Pacific were nearly identical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | chips_0506 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | chips_0506 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Bao Chau Phan | 84 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 Million Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 89
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 Million Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 78
- We can derive knowledge from the news but some people think we can t trust journalists What do you think What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 87
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45945945946 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81520446629 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.3514471997 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157296200017 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657297627589 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042585080073 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944699208509 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307450535649 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.