Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased
steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows
the development of the village.
Write a report
The following charts shows about the development of Chorleywood village near London from the middle of the nineteenth century onwards up to 1994. From the time 1868-1883 there was no sort of development in the region. So assuming it must be a barren or a forest. The map currently showing chorleywood station area was developed around the time 1883-1922. The two area adjoining it were built between 1922 to 1970. The railways were built in 1909 which connect east to west. Golf Course and Park are towards the north of station and was developed post 1970 uptil 1994. Station and park are connected via the main roads. Towards the east of park is the motorway for the village which was built in 1970 as well and the area around the same seems to be developed after 1970 as well
On reviewing the timelines carefully we can make out that majority of the development happened post 1970. Where building of one thing could have lead to another and overall lead to the growth of the Chorleywood Village.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-20 | riyashetty | 73 | view |
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below shows the development of the village Write a report 73
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up 78
- The charts below show what percentage of their daily intake of various nutrients the average person in the USA consumes in each meal and in snacks These nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The following charts shows about the development of Chorleywood vi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of Chorleywood village near London from the middle of the nineteenth century onw...
^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ing it were built between 1922 to 1970. The railways were built in 1909 which conne...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69318181818 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44355176903 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 290.88556701 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8903808225 44.8134815571 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 76.5299724578 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 16.8248392259 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 4.34317383033 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188187781091 0.216113520407 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705636869227 0.0766984524023 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113063854727 0.0603063233224 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117186510774 0.12726935374 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728104884406 0.0580467560999 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 8.37731958763 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 70.7449484536 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 8.71597938144 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 7.59969072165 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.