The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the trends in carbon dioxide emission habits by one person in Britain and three other European countries over a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007.The figures are given in metric tonnes.

Overall, it is clear the United Kingdom had the highest emission per person, while the Portuguese least released the gas. Furthermore, the rate of emissions by the Italian and Portuguese inhabitant has steadily increased, in contrast to the British and Swedish who experienced a decline.

In 1967, approximately eleven metric tonnes of CO2 was given off by a Britain resident, this figure was steady for the next ten years after which it saw a gradual drop to about nine metric weight unit at the end of the period. Despite this, it still emitted the maximum gas. Similarly, a Swedish inhabitant had produced around nine metric tonnes at the start of the year, this value, however, peaked after a decade in contrast to the United Kingdom to around ten metric tonnes. Following this, it saw a drop to seven metric tonnes in 1987 and a further drop to finish at over five in 2007.

On the contrary, the emitting rates of the other two countries significantly climbed during the given period. The Portuguese emission was around one metric tonnes in 1967, but grew strikingly to five, ending at the same figure with Sweden. Lastly, Italy started with just over four metric tonnes emissions per person and increased dramatically to almost double three decades later after which it remained stayed the same till the concluding year.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...over a 40-year period from 1967 to 2007.The figures are given in metric tonnes. ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, lastly, similarly, so, still, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 937.175257732 138% => OK
No of words: 259.0 206.0 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99613899614 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5039614713 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 127.690721649 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548262548263 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 290.88556701 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3010849803 44.8134815571 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.4 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 16.8248392259 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 4.34317383033 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127491998617 0.216113520407 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534397990376 0.0766984524023 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472001446641 0.0603063233224 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093287717155 0.12726935374 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373528992771 0.0580467560999 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 8.37731958763 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 41.2886597938 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.