The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph compares the amount of goods delivery in the UK during the period from 1974 to 2002 by four types of transport.
It is clear from the graph that the number of goods transported by road was the largest while that by pipeline was the lowest over the 28 years. Overall speaking, the quantity delivered by road, water and pipeline climbed almost 20 million tonnes in the past 28 years while the quantity transported by rail remained virtually unchanged at 40 million tonnes.
In 1974 the quantity transported by water is slightly lower than that by rail, but after four years’ development, it has exceeded the quantity transported by rail and then had a dramatic increase from 1978 to 1982. The quantity delivered by rail kept declining from 1978 to 1994 with a slight rising from 1984 to 1988. In around 1994, the amount delivered by rail and road had sora growth and reached 40 million tonnes and 100 million tonnes respectively.
The quantity transported by pipeline was almost naught at the beginning of 1974, which continued climbing steadily in the following years. The rising speed gradually slowed down and until near 1994, it stopped growing and leveled off at about 20 million tonnes.
- The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92195121951 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51397048326 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3732142452 44.8134815571 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.125 76.5299724578 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 16.8248392259 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 4.34317383033 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187176515694 0.216113520407 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961523035693 0.0766984524023 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873583479871 0.0603063233224 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141492315792 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768062254442 0.0580467560999 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 8.37731958763 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.