Some people who have been successful in society don’t attribute their success to the theoretical knowledge they learned from their university. Do you agree the theoretical knowledge is not as valuable as expected?
Many people who are successful in their careers attribute their success to their social skills, working abilities, etc, rather than theoretical knowledge. This may be true in some cases, but I do not agree with the notion that knowledge gained in university is of little value to one’s career achievement.
There are absolutely many reasons for a person to become successful in society and several of them contribute a lot besides theoretical knowledge. Social skill plays a significant role because maintaining good relationship with fellows and customers would make one’s working life smoothly and may reduce much possible unnecessary conflicts and barriers. And people need to accumulate working experiences and enhance their abilities in order to finish their work outstandingly. Besides, some inner qualities are crucial for one to success in their career, for example, being honest and dependable which can bring a sense of trustworthiness would make your superior arranges more significant work for you and you may get more opportunities to promote.
However, good mastery of theoretical knowledge is also vital to one’s success. One who masters theoretical knowledge well would have solid foundation, especially in some realms that need people to have strong basic, for example, excellent musicians always have solid foundation of music theoretical knowledge. Furthermore, great creation in works always comes from those who have good understanding of their basic knowledge. In addition, the process of learning theoretical knowledge is a well-training process of preciseness and critical thinking ability, which are crucial for the success in one’s life.
Therefore, though there are some other important reasons for a person to be successful, good mastery of theoretical knowledge also contributes a lot.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an make comparisions where relevant 67
- The efficient functioning of society is based on rules and laws Society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64492753623 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02318979532 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5622810429 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.636363636 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388717674191 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152512592111 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082247858679 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244122961979 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109651793312 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.