The rendered pie chart illustrates a vivid picture of different kinds of spending habits in percentage in a school during the span of three decades, 1981, 1991, and 2001.
A cursory glance at the given chart is adequate enough to see that Teacher’s salary was the highest amongst the rest, which is 45% while insurance contributed the least throughout the span.
Moving further in 1981 we can observe that the majority of the spending was observed on teacher’s salary [40%], a slight increase was seen in the year 1991, which followed by a slight decrease in the year 2001, secondly, a slight fluctuation can be seen in the salaries of other workers which comprised of 28% in the year 1981 22% in 1991 and 23 % in 2001 respectively. Furthermore, spending on furniture decreased dramatically from 1891 to 1991 nevertheless it went up again in the year 2001.
Moreover, fluctuation can be seen spending on resources and books, initially, a slight rise was observed followed by a steep fall which comprised of 15%, 20% and 9% in the year 1891, 1991, 2001 respectively, lastly, school spending was negligible on insurance initially but increased progressively overtime was almost similar in the year of 1981, 1991 which was 2% and 3% respectively but a jump of 5% can be seen in the year 2001
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 56
- All over the world societies are facing a growing problem with obesity This problem affects both children and adults What are the reasons for this rise in obesity How could it be tackled 56
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001 78
- These days more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time either to find a job or to study There are clearly many benefits to doing this but people who live abroad can also face some difficulties Discuss the advantages a 78
- The key to solving environmental problems is for the present generation to sacrifice their convenient life or live a less comfortable life for the sake of future generations To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
...e seen in the salaries of other workers which comprised of 28% in the year 1981 22% in 1991 and 23...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
...e was observed followed by a steep fall which comprised of 15%, 20% and 9% in the year 1891, 1991,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... jump of 5% can be seen in the year 2001
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 937.175257732 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 206.0 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89592760181 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8805452234 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 127.690721649 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 290.88556701 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6804123711 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 16.3608247423 269% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.669797381 44.8134815571 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 216.4 76.5299724578 283% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.2 16.8248392259 263% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.2 4.34317383033 373% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213182088015 0.216113520407 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138902928914 0.0766984524023 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823293739559 0.0603063233224 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147134173117 0.12726935374 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899609099969 0.0580467560999 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 8.37731958763 283% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.2 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 7.45979381443 227% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.03 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 8.62886597938 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 8.54432989691 229% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 8.15463917526 294% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.