You are a member of an organisation which meets regularly at a particular restaurant. The most recent meal you had there was not satisfactory.Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant. In your letter•explain why you are writing•describe what wen

Essay topics:

You are a member of an organisation which meets regularly at a particular restaurant. The most recent meal you had there was not satisfactory.

Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant. In your letter

• explain why you are writing

• describe what went wrong with the meal and service

• suggest what the manager should do to ensure that you and your group return to the restaurant

Dear manager,

I am writing this letter on behalf of my recent meeting which was organized at your restaurant “The Cornet’s” on behalf of the Lion’s Club on 28th august, Wednesday. The meal was not up to the mark as the regular ones.

The food which was served contained expired meat. The vegetables were not cooked properly. The caterers were not helpful. The request of the guest was not looked upon properly.The meeting was conducted at late night. The meeting was informed to the restaurant at a short notice with less time for preparation.

I would suggest that the management should be aware of the regular customers and meeting which are held regularly at the restaurant. The advance booking should be open at least a week ahead so that the crowd can be managed properly. The late-night parties should be planned so that staffing is present even after the working hours and the charges can be increased for off-hour parties.

Looking forward for a greater hospitality in the future to please the customers.

Regards,

shafaquat

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hich was served contained expired meat. The vegetables were not cooked properly. Th...
^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he vegetables were not cooked properly. The caterers were not helpful. The request ...
^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...roperly. The caterers were not helpful. The request of the guest was not looked upo...
^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... the guest was not looked upon properly.The meeting was conducted at late night. Th...
^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the guest was not looked upon properly.The meeting was conducted at late night. Th...
^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he meeting was conducted at late night. The meeting was informed to the restaurant ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 26.3917525773 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 937.175257732 96% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16571428571 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84955564026 2.54303337028 112% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 290.88556701 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 10.0 0.824742268041 1212% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7431557471 44.8134815571 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1818181818 76.5299724578 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 16.8248392259 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 4.34317383033 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186677991617 0.216113520407 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597207406375 0.0766984524023 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623840024773 0.0603063233224 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913282530803 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585463079756 0.0580467560999 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 8.37731958763 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 7.45979381443 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.