All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some who think that schools should teach children skills. But others believe that having a range of subjects in better for a child’s future.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Moving towards the 21st century, many people are nowadays expressing a deeply growing concern about the role of school in teaching children for their development in the future. In fact, there are some who hold firmly to their belief that skills are well-known to be the best way to assist the children’s development. However, others argue convincingly that studying a range of subjects contribute greatly to children’s life. Therefore, some arguments both for and against this issue will be addressed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, there are two main points for people to defend the former argument school should add a number of essential skills in the curriculum of high school. First of all, it is a well-documented fact that children should be taught three crucial skills, such as communication, problem-solving and teamwork. The most obvious example to prove is that nowadays children or young people having a huge problem with expressing their opinions in the workplace. Furthermore, there is no doubt that scientists proved that skills are considered to be the key to the children’s job when they work in society. For instance, when children become an employee on a team, so they must have teamwork skill to connect with other colleagues.
On the other hand, there are two primary evidences for other people to support the latter argument learning a range of academic subjects, such as Mathematics, History and Foreign Language is the best way to support the children’s living. First and foremost, it is commonly accepted that children can earn more money when they are good at a specific profession. A clear example being found to prove is that approximately 70% of students looking for a job in Vietnam after they graduated, but just a minor of this number can find a good job thus they know everything but they also don’t know the detail of one thing. Equally important, there is no denying that the manufacturing industry needs more engineers that they are a good quality person to control the new technology.
All things considered, it is my strongly belief that skills and academic subjects are so important for the children’s future. Accordingly, I strongly recommend the governments should enhance people’s awareness in terms of the role of school in teaching and what things are schools should be teaching. If this recommendation is carried out, the comprehensive development of our future generations will be ensured.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | lexuanthai93 | 73 | view |
- Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of pet ownership for animals and for the community as a whole 89
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some who think that schools should teach children skills. But others believe that having a range of subjects in better for a child’s future.Discuss both these views and give your own 73
- Deforestation caused human activity is happening in many parts of the world 78
- Some people think that parents should be responsible for teaching children how to be good members of society. However, other people believe that school is the place for children to learn how to be good members of society. 73
- The line graph shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in European between 1979 and 2004 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...on't know the detail of one thing. Equally important, there is no denying that the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, no doubt, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2144638404 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08578275501 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536159600998 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2773580064 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6875 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0625 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31311027762 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10610039346 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612622119733 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201998480595 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709688997336 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.