Although families have powerful influence on children, the influence that comes from outside the family plays a bigger part in children’s development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The growth of a kid is influenced by a great deal of factors such as families and impact from outside home, which are two of the most important parts. It is said that families has more powerful effects on a child’s growing than friends, education environment and other factors. From my perspective, i equally agree and disagree with this statement. This essay will analyze my point of view.
On the one hand, I believe that families have the most enormous control on the development of a youngster because of these main reason. First of all, family was the place that a baby was born and grew up. It can be explained that family plays an important role, which is the foundation of the development of a person in the future. For example, offsprings of rich family tend to have better living standard, which has positive effects on the improvement conditions of children. If young people know how to take advantage of money, it will become a motive power to success. Moreover, children are the duplication of their parents. To illustrate, the adult who have good behavior and character can teach their offspring better than the worse ones do. Therefore, it can not be denied that families have a huge influence on the development of children.
On the other hand, school and technology are also essential in process of children’s growing up. The biggest reason is school become "the second home" of children after 3 years old. It can be explained that 3-years-upward children spend majority of time at school, as a result, education environment is the most important part which influence on the changes in their personal characters and behaviors. In particular, the compliments from teachers can create students's confidence as well as motivation to try hard. Furthermore, with the devlopment of technology, it becomes an equally significant part impact on the growth of teenagers. For instance, the prevelence of smartphones can lead to addiction if these devices are overused by youngsters. Hence, technology should be taken advantage to improve children's skills effective, instead of playing games too much or other useless actions.
In conclusion, both family and surrouding factors are because of their significant inpact on the development of a child. People should pay the attention to these factors to create better future for their child.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | vankhanh2k60209@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Lee Daisy | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Nam3666 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | nhunnnnn | 67 | view |
- Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some believe that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together while others claim that holding the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion Space travel has been pos 56
- Some people believe that young people should spend their free time with family rather than go to entertainment activities outside the house Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Although families have powerful influence on children the influence that comes from outside the family plays a bigger part in children s development To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88817693566 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532299741602 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4500120342 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306082860138 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824384387628 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699327903437 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165227132467 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822307300098 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.