The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to
increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the most effective solution to tackle global environmental issues is to increase the cost of fossil fuels. While this measure could have some advantages, I believe that there are more ways which may result in better outcomes to alleviate environmental problems.
There are some merits when raising the cost of fossil fuels. Firstly, this would encourage people to use their car less, which means a reduction in exhaust emissions. Secondly, by using less coal or oil can produces a positive impact on the environment by slowing the process of global warming. Moreover, as the sources of these fuels are coming to an end, this measure would reduce our dependence on these kinds of power source. For example, it is estimated that by 2100, the world is going to face the shortage of oil due to uncontrolled exploitation.
However, there are actually more beneficial ways to solve environmental degradation. One of them is introducing restrictions on the use of private vehicles. For example, cars and motorbikes are not allowed to be used in some main roads of a city, which not only reduces traffic congestion and enhances the use of public means of transport such as buses, but also decrease the need of petrol. Also, governments around the world should allocate resources to development of alternative energy sources such as sun or wind power. These power sources is indefinite and have a low cost and proved no harm to the environment. Finally, international cooperation to share scientific knowledge and advances in technology should be a top priority of policies of many nations.
In conclusion, raising the cost of fossil fuels can be a welcome measure, but more effective steps are required to achieve sustainable development by protecting the environment.
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 84
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 77
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.To what extent do you agree or disagre 73
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and gives your opinion 73
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to resp 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...Secondly, by using less coal or oil can produces a positive impact on the environment by...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11604095563 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9439150131 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3601434594 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111693427307 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393408368931 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393507299465 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759115567188 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286947469553 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.