The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In bygone days, the question of whether team sports at school is the best way to increase the cooperation of children became a topic of discussion. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this statement. This essay will attempt to analyze the advantages and drawbacks of this phenomenon.
On the one hand, educating children to cooperate through team sports offers several benefits. The main positive of this is no favoritism. To be more specific, whereas parents could pamper and belittle children in education at home, trainers at school treat young students equally. For example, the students, who are good at cooperation, could be rewarded worthy, while the students having negative actions toward teammates could be punished. As a result, equal treatment leads to the high efficiency of the young generation's education. Furthermore, young generations could learn how to show their strong points to support all team.
On the other hand, there is also plenty of negatives to this statement. To begin with, the primary downside of this is that the sport is not suitable for all young students. In other words, a sort of student, who is timid, could not adapt to a sports team. Consequently, they would be isolated by themselves, and that could lead to various mental illnesses, especially, autism. Moreover, the second negative impact is the appearance of violence. By way of explanation, sports competition could cause some violent situations in the case of significantly active children. This phenomenon results in negative effects on other team members, such as division into groups conflicting with each other, catalyzing the increase of physical fighting in an educational environment.
In conclusion, although there is a benefit of team sports at school to the cooperation of children, I believe that their drawbacks are worth taking into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | tracywu | 61 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In bygone days, the question of whether team sports at school is the best way t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tages and drawbacks of this phenomenon. On the one hand, educating children to c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...ads to the high efficiency of the young generations education. Furthermore, young generatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34797297297 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96729917742 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4015696007 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1176470588 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7058823529 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241823934579 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770094965824 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098636994769 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175136214472 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597642289147 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In bygone days, the question of whether team sports at school is the best way t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tages and drawbacks of this phenomenon. On the one hand, educating children to c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...ads to the high efficiency of the young generations education. Furthermore, young generatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, sort of, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34797297297 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96729917742 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4015696007 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1176470588 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7058823529 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241823934579 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770094965824 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098636994769 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175136214472 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597642289147 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.