The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people would agree that cooperation is an essential skill for everyone to learn, so that they can fit in with others. Thus, teaching students to cooperate should be taken seriously. Some suggest this could be best done by encourage children to participate in team sports, for example, football. Nevertheless, in my opinion, while playing sports can enhance their teamworking skills to some extent, it has some limitations compared to other methods of education.
People avocating the idea of teaching cooperation via sports tend to argue that the game requires a great deal of interactions and communication among team members in order to achieve victory. Therefore, by playing many games in a team, adolescenes will gradually learn to work with others. However, while this may be the case for professional atheletes, it is not likely to work well for children. This is because some tactical aspects of sports could be too complex for them to handle, making them eventually focus on their own's play instead of their teammates. For instance, in football, players have to identify teammates who are in convenient positions to make a pass, use body language to signal them, and then pass the ball accurately. These skills require years of hard training to master, hence, they are not suitable for the majority schoolers to learn.
To approach this problem in a more effective way, I suggest teachers to take smaller steps. In particular, they can design tasks that are incredibly challenging to do individually and assign them to all students. After students struggle doing the assignment for themselves. the teacher can then suggest a collaborative way of completing it. By doing this, students will hopefully appreciate the power of teamwork and acquire this skill better.
In conclusion, it is widely recognized that cooperation is important for people to work and live together. While playing sports can develop this skill, it may not be the most appropriate way for children due to its sophistication. Instead, I believe that other group activities that are specially designed for teamworking development would do a better job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | tracywu | 61 | view |
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to live and study abroad 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production 61
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...n tasks that are incredibly challenging to do individually and assign them to all stu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to do'.
Suggestion: to do
...o all students. After students struggle doing the assignment for themselves. the teac...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...le doing the assignment for themselves. the teacher can then suggest a collaborativ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21449275362 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89970411835 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591304347826 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8242405401 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159510578073 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520259235918 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341557365771 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103974270733 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321113384991 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.