The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graphs illustrate the average proportion of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar contained in Americans different meals of a day.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that Americans consume more sugar during day-time meals and snacks. In contrast, the 2 other types of nutrients are consumed more in dinners.
For breakfast, people in the US have a healthy meal with considerably equal proportion of nutrients, with 14% of sodium and sugar, and 16% of saturated fat. The percentage of sodium and fat then witnesses a considerable increase of 15% and 10%, respectively, during the next meal of the day.
In terms of snack, its figure for added sugar is the highest, at 42%. The data for the other nutrients in snack are significantly lower than sugar, at lower than 22%. Dinner has the most proportion of sodium and saturated fat, at 43% and 37%, for each. The percentage of added sugar in dinner is 23%, which is more than 13% lower than the remaining nutrients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 11 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | sandynguyen1686@gmail.com | view |
- Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- Many people use social media to get in touch with other people and know about news events Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 61
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 1615.20841683 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 169.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8875739645 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74205295023 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 176.041082164 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 506.74238477 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0363756538 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0693308688852 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342169553529 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253178170273 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472564195688 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102907808524 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 78.4519038076 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.