The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and
B in two years, 1960 and 2010.
The given pie charts compare the proportion of workers in three distinct sectors, namely manufacturing, sales, services in Towns A and B surveyed in 1960 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage of people working in town A showed a downward trend in 2010 in comparison to that of 1960’s figures. By contrast, town B workers in the manufacturing and services sector went up throughout 2010.
Concerning town A, In 1960, the manufacturing slice contributed the lowest percentage of workers at nearly 30%, doubling to be the dominant sector in 2010. Meanwhile, the proportion of services and sales recorded a reverse pattern of declining from one third and 40% to half of their first figures in 1960.
In regard to Town B, sales slice ranked top as it contained approximately three-quarters of the pie chart which was then plummeted to 53%. Conversely, the manufacturing and services slices underwent a substantial increase in the percentage of workers. One per ten staff resources went into the manufacturing sector in 1960, skyrocketing to a quarter in 2010, followed by the proportion of services workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | TRAN NGOC LINH | 56 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 73
- some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important 61
- Economic growth in recent years in both developed countries and developing countries made some people richer However research shows that people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before Why does this ha 78
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and 2008 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, so, then, third, while, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 179.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21787709497 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17770548952 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7427873182 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334736372518 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154789016386 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1137411539 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222506267077 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10791887419 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.