Children should be given pocket money. Do you agree or disagree?
Childrens like to spend money. And it depends whether they spend money in useful way or in a bad way, that pocket money should be given or not. I rather prefer not to give pocket money because of several reasons which are in ensuing paragraphs and I completely disagree with the writer's notion.
Giving pocket money to the children is not the good thing because we don't know that where the children use that money, it could be an addictive things like drugs, narcotics, alcohol etcetera. It is very harmful for children. If they used to cigarettes and beer like things then it is very hard to leave the habits of that for them and for parents as well.
Addition to this, it also affect the studies of children so that of future too. This affect studies by several ways, first, the children uses that money for entertainment like parties, movies and so on. Then roaming in the city with the peers and eat unhealthy food which can cause severe diseases and also uses that money in gaming zones and other stuffs like that. It also affect the studies because it distracting from it by using the money. Moreover they also waste the money by giving to friends or unwanted parties with peer groups and because of it the children became in contact with bad childrens.
To wrap up, instead of giving pocket money we should give money when they want and after listening that where they are going to spend that money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-23 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Tran Dai Phuc | 61 | view |
| 2024-10-27 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
| 2024-10-12 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ether they spend money in useful way or in a bad way, that pocket money should be given or n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...aphs and I completely disagree with the writers notion. Giving pocket money to the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ildren is not the good thing because we dont know that where the children use that m...
^^^^
Line 9, column 27, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...as well. Addition to this, it also affect the studies of children so that of futu...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...nes and other stuffs like that. It also affect the studies because it distracting from...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...distracting from it by using the money. Moreover they also waste the money by giving to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62055335968 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16021556078 2.80592935109 77% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517786561265 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5361820625 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278478059728 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117256772397 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807601710363 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194741515989 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885897835252 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.