Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
With rapid development of internet technology and logistics, the interactions among many countries have become more and more frequent than before. Benefiting from the trend of globalization, many products have been available for people to purchase anywhere in the world. A prevailing view held by many people is that this trend is a negative development since countries are becoming similar, while I strongly disagree with them.
It’s not plausible that countries will lose their own traits and get similar as the same products are bought by their people. Although there might be plenty of similar products in the country, I believe each country can still retain their own cultures and traits, since these are largely determined by the citizens’ lifestyle and behaviors from the past.
Globalization certainly is a positive development for every nation in many aspects. To be more specific, as the sources of revenue for many business companies are now not only local people but worldwide, their income would experience a significant rise. Meanwile, growing number of transactions with the rest of world will entail a strong growth in domestic economy, leading to a better life of local people. Moreover, global transactions will be instrumental for people to learn about different cultures from the rest of world. The effective communications with other cultures will help people obtain a completely difference understanding of their own culture, which can’t be achieved without globalization. As a consequence, the local culture can abandon what’s harmful in it and absorb good ideas.
In a conclusion, people always concern that interactions with other culture might have some detrimental effects on their own country. However, in fact, it’s the opposite. Globalization helps not only the development of culture but also the economy, bringing people a huge amount of benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in jive different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('completely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('difference') instead of another adjective.
... other cultures will help people obtain a completely difference understanding of their own culture, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46598639456 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95173234983 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568027210884 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5712568678 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203843627282 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704775189642 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592189840282 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124683895477 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880799596031 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.