Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, it is possible to see similar products in every part of the world. Some claim that this happens due to the fact that nations are increasingly identical to each other. It is a debatable issue whether such a trend is positive or negative for the following reasons.
On the one hand, easily accessible products improve customers’ experience. People do not need to travel far just to purchase a single piece of merchandise. For example, Vietnamese foods are widely traded in American markets, which allows Vietnamese who work or study away from home to buy their hometown specialty without waiting for the products to ship or needing to travel back to their home countries. Furthermore, when Vietnamese specialty appears in America, US citizens can also taste to get a glimpse of the culture or cuisine of Vietnam. Therefore, the trend mentioned above is a positive development that improves both the economic and cultural bonds between nations.
On the other hand, since products are being replicated, the quality may not remain the same as it used to be. Some special products or merchandise, such as specialty, are something that is hard to reproduce while trying to maintain the original flavor. For example, it is not difficult to find pizza with several creative flavors around the world, but it is certainly not easy to find the original flavor in other places rather than in Italy. Hence, certain products reflect the long-term traditions and culture of the country. Therefore, it is important to retain its originality to keep its uniqueness. Because of this reason, the trend may be regarded as a threaten towards culture and history.
In sum, the discussed issue demonstrates both negative and positive sides. However, in my point of view, positive arguments have more weight, and it is vital to exploit these advantages while also preventing the disadvantages of such a trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history of their country. Why is this? What can be done to increase young people’s interest in famous people in the history of their country? 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...is reason, the trend may be regarded as a threaten towards culture and history. In sum, t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7875919658 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2673220202 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184854027178 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052230103711 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329408894738 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102585045404 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238998218602 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.