Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is argued that the similarity of nations is becoming more and more visible due to the availability of similar goods for consumers all over the world. I completely agree that this is an advantaged growth.
There are several reasons why this development is not a proper method. Firstly, it causes dramatic impairments of diversity in our cultures and traditions. Secondly, this growth will limit our experiences in tourism, we could allocate to that product elsewhere before we have it in its originated place. Finally, using the similar products at any areas over the world leads to the degradation of product’s true value. For example, if you purchased the goods from where it is not original, you could not have several features related to its from stem nations.
I believe that utilizing similar goods from any locations on the world is a better approach for development. There is a significantly large variety of goods for customers to choose what they think are necessary. The availability of goods helps people easily purchase from anywhere on this planet. Furthermore, it is much cheaper way to acquire a product appearing on any shelves over the world. For example, I remember that when I was a child, I wanted a soccer ball from famous brand such as: Nike or Adidas, which was not available at that time in my country, my father asked his friend to import that good from abroad and I had to wait for such a long time.
In conclusion, my view is that nations are turning into similarity because of the products that benefit to the growth of each country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71646910337 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1188428534 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.153846154 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212019075797 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757386260919 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607437126039 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137075892778 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597423457675 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.