Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The industrial revolution has energized the burst of global trade, which result in the increasing tendency of purchasing the identical goods and services from different parts of the world. There are foundations which lead us to believe that such a trend either brought positive or negative effects to the society.
It is hardly to denied the fact that mass consumption empower the economy globally. By putting orders through a click on commercial websites, consumers can access to products effortlessly. Due to such events, companies are not only forced to constantly creative so as to create more unique products, but also have to improve the quality and productivity to adapt the tremendous demand of customers. Therefore, people have various choice in term of goods and services, with several prices, discounts, and so on. The young can enjoy delicious and nutritious refreshment, along with handy gifts, owing to some famous beverage brands for young adults in Vietnam, for example, Milo and Ovaltine.
However, let’s not forget to take the negative impact of the issue into account. Increasing in request for being trendy and fashionable on a limited budgets, thousands prefer to purchase fake products of prestigious and original brands like Channels, Dior, or Gucci. Bustling in chasing the trend, citizens neglect the traditional and cultural values with regard to fashion. For instance, instead of introduce the national costumes to cronies across the world, the young enjoy showing off their fashionable and spurious Channel purse. In the long run, the national values may be forgotten.
All things considered, I have firmly basis to believe that global trade is both a positive and negative development to countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... not only forced to constantly creative so as to create more unique products, but also h...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34798534799 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75227867497 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663003663004 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1766610277 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106887291502 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316281496382 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291501114198 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635103950392 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202590195392 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.